By Michael A. RoBards, LCSW
Typing the people around you is one of the most natural things to do once you know the system, and one of the least accurate. Here is how to do it better, and how to know when to stop.
From the outside, you see behavior, and behavior is filtered through context. The colleague who is quiet in meetings might be an introvert or an extravert who hates that meeting. Still, four things are somewhat observable:
Their inner life. The whole point of introverted functions is that they happen out of view. You see a person's extraverted side and infer the rest, which is exactly how INFJs get typed as extraverts and ISTPs get typed as cold. You also see one context. A Feeler at work may run entirely on logic because the job demands it. Typing someone from their professional persona is like typing yourself from your job interview.
Ask. Not “what is your type,” which puts people on the spot, but the behavioral questions: “Do you come home from a party wired or wiped?” “Do you like the weekend planned or open?” People answer those happily, and the answers are worth more than your observation. If you want a structured version, the Insight System's Type Someone New tool walks you through exactly these questions for a person you know and gives you a best-fit profile to compare against.
I see couples do this in the room, and it can go two ways. Done as curiosity — “I think you might be a J, does this sound like you?” — it opens a conversation. Done as diagnosis — “you're such a P, that's why you never follow through” — it closes one. The type you assign someone is a hypothesis about them. They get the final vote.
The Insight Game is built on the clinical Type and Temperament work of Dr. Martine J. RoBards, Ph.D. (1946–2017). Live community accuracy data is on the research page.